Brian concentrates in ERISA withdrawal liability litigation for the firm’s multiemployer pension fund clients, including the Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, the International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, the Steelworkers Pension Trust, and the Alaska Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Pension Fund.

Before joining Tucker Arensberg, Brian was a judicial law clerk to two federal judges in Pittsburgh: the Honorable Nora Barry Fisher, U.S. District Judge (Sept. 2017 to May 2018), and the Honorable Cynthia Reed Eddy, Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dec. 2013 to Sept. 2017). During that time, Brian drafted dozens of judicial opinions involving a myriad of substantive and procedural issues. Brian now uses that invaluable experience to develop case strategies and craft legal arguments in withdrawal liability disputes, which are often worth millions of dollars and involve complicated and unsettled legal issues.

Brian has litigated a wide range of withdrawal liability issues, including:

• The building and construction industry exemption.
• Transactions to evade or avoid withdrawal liability.
• Successor, alter ego, and single-employer liability.
• Partial withdrawals (70% declines, bargaining outs, facility takeouts).
• Calculation of withdrawal liability.
• Controlled group liability.
• Interplay between ERISA and Bankruptcy Code.
• Enforcement of “pay now, dispute later” rule.
• Laches.

Brian also helps recover delinquent contributions from active employers.

• Action to collect withdrawal liability against an employer and its controlled group member; district court granted summary judgment, finding that the companies were a brother-sister controlled group when applying the Treasury Department’s spousal attribution rules. Int’l Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. I. Losch Inc., 2022 WL 4386232, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172567 (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2022), reconsideration denied by 2023 WL 24167, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1094 (D. Md. Jan. 3, 2023).
• Actions to confirm a $79 million arbitration award and recover an additional $18 million in statutory damages; district court and Third Circuit upheld the arbitration award against the former controlled group members of a withdrawn employer who violated ERISA’s “evade or avoid” provision by engaging in a complex financial transaction that was designed in principal part to insulate themselves from the employer’s projected withdrawal liability; district court and Third Circuit also ordered the former controlled group members to pay an additional $18 million in statutory damages for failing to make interim payments to the fund after being notified of the fund’s claim. Steelworkers Pension Trust v. Renco Group, Inc., Fed. App’x, 2021 WL 3788945 (3d Cir. Aug. 26, 2021).
• Discovery dispute in “evade or avoid” case involving the common interest privilege; district court agreed with the fund that the privilege did not apply, compelled the documents sought by the fund, denied reconsideration, refused to certify its order to the Ninth Circuit for interlocutory review, and awarded the fund all reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection with the motions practice. Miller v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith Nat’l Pension Trust, 2021 WL 2935056 (E.D. Wash. Apr. 16, 2021), reconsideration denied by, 2021 WL 2934590 (E.D. Wash. Jul. 12, 2021); 2021 WL 6246617 (E.D. Wash. Sept. 14, 2021).
• Action to appoint arbitrator to preside over a $205 million withdrawal liability dispute; federal court refused to select any of the arbitrators proposed by the company (all former judges with no prior withdrawal liability experience and whom the company had ex parte interviews); court instead chose a traditional labor and pension arbitrator proposed by the fund notwithstanding the company’s generalized and speculative claims of bias. General Electric Co. v.
  Boilermaker-Blacksmith Nat’l Pension Trust, 2020 WL 2113209 (D. Kan. May 4, 2020).
• Action to compel interim payments pending arbitration; district court held as a matter of first impression that there is no equitable exception to the “pay now, dispute later” rule and ordered the employer to make payments pending arbitration regardless of whether doing so would cause the employer irreparable injury. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust v. PSF Industries, Inc., 424 F. Supp. 3d 1103 (D. Kan. 2019).

• “Building and Construction Industry Rules,” Presenter at IUPAT Professionals Forum, Las Vegas, NV, January 2023.
• “Worth a Closer Look: The Building and Construction Industry Withdrawal Liability Exemption,” Benefits Magazine, December 2020 Issue - Co-authored with Neil Gregorio, Esq.
• “Withdrawal Liability,” Tucker Arensberg’s Labor & Employment Update, Sept. 2019.
• "View from the Other Side of the Bench: Practical Tips for Effective Employment Law Practices in the Western District of Pennsylvania," PBI Employment Law Institute CLE, November 2017.