Pittsburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
One PPG Place, Suite 1500
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 566-1212
(412) 594-5619
Directions to Pittsburgh

Harrisburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
2 Lemoyne Drive, Suite 200
Lemoyne, PA 17043
(717) 234-4121
(717) 232-6802
Directions to Harrisburg

New York, NY

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
250 Park Avenue, Suite 1508, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10171
(212) 739-7910
(212) 739-9607
Directions to New York

Widget Title

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
    • News
    • Articles
    • Speaking
  • Office Locations
    • Pittsburgh
    • Harrisburg
    • New York
  • About the Firm
    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Affiliations
    • Pro Bono & Community

Title

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Attorneys in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, New York City

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
  • About Our Firm
  • COVID 19: Answers to Business Challenges
ShareBookmarkPDF

OOR Defines “Employment Applications”

Articles, Right to Know Law Blog October 6, 2020

In O’Brien v. City of Pittsburgh, AP 2019-1694, the Requester sought records regarding the employment application, including a psychological assessment conducted by the City, of an individual who was not as a City police officer.  The City denied the request and, on appeal, argued that records were exempt under Section708(b)(7)(iv) of the RTKL

Section 708(b)(7) of the RTKL, exempts from disclosure certain “records relating to an agency employee,” including “[t]he employment application of an individual who is not hired by the agency.” 65 P.S. § 67.708(b)(7)(iv).

Although the RTKL does not define “employment application,” the OOR noted that it had previously found that material submitted by the applicant for consideration by the hiring agency falls under Section 708(b)(7)(iv), while extraneous material either not provided by the applicant or not intended to be used in the hiring decision, does not.  Accordingly, the OOR denied the request.

Based on the foregoing, resumes, letters and other documents accompanying an applications may be exempt from disclosure.  See Wuertenberg v. Franklin Cnty., AP 2013-2162 (resumes submitted by applicants qualify for exemption); Frable v. Pleasant Valley Sch. Dist., OOR Dkt. AP 2016-0683, 2016 PA O.O.R.D. LEXIS 876 (clearances and letters expressing interest qualify under exemption).

Open Records Officers frequently receive requests for information about unsuccessful job applicants and it is critical they understand what can and cannot be released.  This recent determination by the OOR provides helpful guidance.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Voltz or any of the other Municipal and School Attorneys at Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Primary Sidebar

OOR Defines “Employment Applications”

Related

People

  • Christopher L. Voltz

Practice Areas

  • Municipal & School
© 2021 All Rights Reserved|Tucker Arensberg, P.C.|Log in|Powered by Content Pilot
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Accept