Pittsburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
One PPG Place, Suite 1500
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 566-1212
(412) 594-5619
Directions to Pittsburgh

Harrisburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
300 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200
Camp Hill, PA 17011
(717) 234-4121
(717) 232-6802
Directions to Harrisburg

New York, NY

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
250 Park Avenue, Suite 1508, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10171
(212) 739-7910
(212) 739-9607
Directions to New York

Foster City, CA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
1098 Foster City Boulevard, Suite 106 #700
Foster City, California 94404
(650)208-2701
Directions to Foster City

Widget Title

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
    • News
    • Articles
    • Speaking
  • Office Locations
    • Pittsburgh
    • Harrisburg
    • New York
    • Foster City
  • About the Firm
    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Women@Tucker
    • Affiliations
    • Pro Bono & Community

Title

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Attorneys in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, New York City

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
  • About Our Firm
  • COVID 19: Answers to Business Challenges
ShareBookmarkPDF

Pennsylvania Courts Split Over Sexual Orientation Discrimination

Articles August 21, 2017

A recent decision by Judge Jan E. DuBois in Coleman v. Amerihealth Caritas, No. 16-3652, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85319 (E.D. Pa. June 2, 2017) demonstrates that Pennsylvania courts remain divided as to whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII) prohibits sexual orientation discrimination by employers.  Pennsylvania courts likely will continue to reach different rulings until this question is resolved by a higher court, such as the Third Circuit Court of Appeals or the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Coleman, a Philadelphia man named Justin Coleman alleged that his former employer, Amerihealth Caritas, used gay slurs against him, punched him, and spread false rumors about his gender and sexuality.  Coleman sued Amerihealth Caritas for sexual orientation discrimination under Title VII.  The company moved to dismiss Coleman’s claim.  It argued that federal law does not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination by employers.

Judge DuBois agreed with Amerihealth Caritas.  She ruled that although Amerihealth Caritas’s behavior was unacceptable, “Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation.”  Judge DuBois thus dismissed Coleman’s sexual orientation discrimination claim with prejudice.

This decision directly conflicts with a ruling eight months earlier by Judge Cathy Bissoon, a federal judge in the Western District of Pennsylvania.  Under similar facts in EEOC v. Scott Med. Health Ctr., P.C., 217 F. Supp. 3d 834 (W.D. Pa. 2016), Judge Bissoon refused to dismiss the plaintiff’s sexual orientation discrimination claim.  She found that Title VII barred sexual orientation discrimination because such discrimination inevitably involves judgments or stereotypes about how a person should behave based on their sex.

Pennsylvania courts are not the only ones that continue to issue different rulings on this issue.  Judges across the United States have issued conflicting decisions as to whether Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination.  Many legal experts thus believe that the U.S. Supreme Court will eventually decide one of these cases to bring clarity and finality to this area of the law.  But until that day arrives, employers should keep a close eye on how Pennsylvania judges rule on workplace sexual orientation discrimination claims so that they understand their legal obligations.

For additional information contact Shane Miller.

Primary Sidebar

Related

Topics

  • Municipal & School
© 2022 All Rights Reserved|Tucker Arensberg, P.C.|Log in|Powered by Content Pilot
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy