Pittsburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
One PPG Place, Suite 1500
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 566-1212
(412) 594-5619
Directions to Pittsburgh

Harrisburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
300 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200
Camp Hill, PA 17011
(717) 234-4121
(717) 232-6802
Directions to Harrisburg

New York, NY

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
250 Park Avenue, Suite 1508, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10171
(212) 739-7910
(212) 739-9607
Directions to New York

Foster City, CA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
1098 Foster City Boulevard, Suite 106 #700
Foster City, California 94404
(650)208-2701
Directions to Foster City

Widget Title

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
    • News
    • Articles
    • Speaking
  • Office Locations
    • Pittsburgh
    • Harrisburg
    • New York
    • Foster City
  • About the Firm
    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Women@Tucker
    • Affiliations
    • Pro Bono & Community

Title

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Attorneys in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, New York City

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
  • About Our Firm
  • COVID 19: Answers to Business Challenges
ShareBookmarkPDF

Pennsylvania employers beware: One slur by a supervisor can now create a hostile work environment.

Articles July 21, 2017

The Third Circuit recently ruled that a single extreme act of discrimination can produce an actionable hostile work environment claim.  In doing so, the court clarified that the legal standard for such claims requires that an employee prove he or she was subjected to “severe or pervasive” conduct as opposed to “severe and pervasive” conduct.  The Third Circuit presides over Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey, so employers in those states should take note of this decision because it expands the scope of conduct that could make them liable for employment discrimination.

In the case in question, two African American employees were working on a fence removal project when a supervisor told them that if they “n***** rigged” the fence, they would be fired. The court summed up why such misconduct could be actionable under the employment discrimination laws as follows:

Here Plaintiffs alleged that their supervisor used a racially charged slur in front of them and their non-African American coworkers.  Within the same breath, the use of this word was accompanied by threats of termination (which ultimately occurred).  This constitutes severe conduct that could create a hostile work environment.

In light of this ruling, increased attention to, and enforcement of, company anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies will be critical for employers.  Supervisors and managers should be trained regularly to ensure they understand their obligations and that a single incident could be enough to create employment discrimination liability.

If you have any questions about the impact of the Third Circuit’s decision on your business, please contact Jeremy Farrell or (412) 594-3938.

The name of the case is Castleberry v. STI Group

and a copy of the court’s opinion can be found here.

Primary Sidebar

Related

Topics

  • Labor & Employment
© 2023 All Rights Reserved|Tucker Arensberg, P.C.|Log in|Powered by Content Pilot
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy