Pittsburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
One PPG Place, Suite 1500
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
(412) 566-1212
(412) 594-5619
Directions to Pittsburgh

Harrisburg, PA

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
2 Lemoyne Drive, Suite 200
Lemoyne, PA 17043
(717) 234-4121
(717) 232-6802
Directions to Harrisburg

New York, NY

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
250 Park Avenue, Suite 1508, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10171
(212) 739-7910
(212) 739-9607
Directions to New York

Widget Title

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
    • News
    • Articles
    • Speaking
  • Office Locations
    • Pittsburgh
    • Harrisburg
    • New York
  • About the Firm
    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Affiliations
    • Pro Bono & Community

Title

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Attorneys in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, New York City

  • People
  • Practice Areas
  • News + Insights
  • About Our Firm
  • COVID 19: Answers to Business Challenges
ShareBookmarkPDF

Advisory Opinion: Free van shuttle services to medical facilities

Articles November 4, 2015

On October 21, 2015 the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General posted Advisory Opinion No. 15-13.  This Opinion relates to a request for Advisory Opinion about a plan to offer free van shuttle services to certain medical facilities in an integrated health system.  The Office of Inspector General (the “OIG”) concluded that although the proposed arrangement could potentially generate prohibited remuneration under the anti-kickback statute if the intent to induce referrals were present, the OIG would not impose administrative sanctions in connection with the proposed arrangement.  In its analysis, the OIG considered a number of factors including: (i) the service would not be determined in a manner related to the past or anticipated volume or value of federal healthcare program business; (ii) the service would not include air, luxury or ambulance level transportation; (iii) van drivers would not be paid on a per person or per patient transported basis; (iv) the longest shuttle circuit was approximately 18 miles and was therefore distinguishable from those arrangements which sought to “leap frog competitor facilities and recruit beneficiaries from beyond the offerors’ primary service areas”; (v) the program was not marketed or advertised to the general public; (vi) the cost of the program is not shifted onto Medicare, a state healthcare program, other payers, or individuals; (vii) the arrangement was unlikely to subsidize the practices of private physicians; and (viii) local public transportation in the area was limited.  While an advisory opinion cannot be relied upon by anyone other than the requesting party, these factors should certainly be given consideration should an entity of which to establish a free transportation program.

For additional information, please contact Paul Welk at pwelk@tuckerlaw.com.

Primary Sidebar

Related

Topics

  • Health Care Law

People

  • Paul J. Welk
© 2021 All Rights Reserved|Tucker Arensberg, P.C.|Log in|Powered by Content Pilot
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Accept