|
healthlaw reference
- September 2003 -
CMS Proposes 2004 Physician Fee Schedule
By Michael
A. Cassidy, Esq.
On August 15, 2003, the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed Physician Fee
Schedule for 2004. As expected, and as required by law, the Fee Schedule
proposes a 4.2 percent reduction in physician reimbursement. However,
CMS issued the fee schedule accompanied by the following very
significant caveat:
"Physicians should note that while CMS is required to publish a
proposed physician fee schedule at this time, both the House and the
Senate version of the Medicare legislation contain provisions that
address the proposed fee schedule cuts."
The proposed fee schedule reductions are mandated by the design of
the physician fee schedule (RB-RVS). When the volume of Medicare
physician services increases, the fee schedule methodology is designed
to impose a reimbursement reduction in order to maintain budget
neutrality. However, Congress has interceded several times in the past
when Medicare cuts were proposed. Last year, Congress mandated a 1.6
percent increase instead of the proposed 5.4 percent reduction proposed
by CMS. This year, the House has already proposed a 1.5 percent
increase, while at least one Senate plan merely attempts to eliminate
the anticipated reduction.
In addition to the proposed fee schedule reductions (which can be
accessed at our Web site www.tuckerlaw.com in the Health Care practice
section; click on "Health Resources") there are also suggested changes
in several specific areas. Public comment is due by October 7, 2003 and
can be submitted (original plus 2 copies) at the following address:
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services
Department of Health and
Human Services
Attn: CMS-1476-P
P.O. Box 8013
Baltimore, MD 21244-8013
CMS has also designated an individual responsible for each specific
area; their names and telephone numbers are included in the respective
discussions.
Outpatient Therapy Services
Performed as "Incident to"
Physician Services
CMS is seeking comments regarding whether licensing standards should
be imposed upon individuals who provide
outpatient therapy services to Medicare beneficiaries in physician
offices as "incident to" services. The request for comments states that
the licensing standards imposed by 42 CFR § 484.4 are applicable in
"almost all settings" except physician offices. The intent of CMS is
clear from the announcement, which states:
"While there are currently no national standards for qualifications
of individuals providing outpatient therapy services incident to
physician services, we believe that standards similar to those in §
454.4 are appropriate…
"We are considering adopting the existing qualification and training
standards (with the exception of licensure) in § 454.4 for individuals
providing therapy services independently and incident to physician
services."
Public comments are solicited. The CMS contact person listed as
responsible for this issue is Dorothy Shannon (410-786-3396).
A. Resource Based Practice
Expenses
CMS is continuing what it describes as a massive refinement of the
practice expense RVUs as part of a process that is designed to convert
the expense methodology from one which allocated expenses within medical
practices based upon charges to one which allocates expenses based upon
utilized resources, designated as a "top down" methodology. The practice
expense proposals for 2004 are as follows:
1. Non-Physician Work Pool
The non-physician work pool will continue for 2004. This concept was
created to allocate expenses based upon clinical staff input for
services which did not have physician work components, and was necessary
because the existing expense allocation method allocated practice
expenses to procedures based upon physician time. This will continue
while further study is performed.
2. Supplemental Practice Expense Survey
The Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 required CMS, then HCFA,
to survey practice organizations in order to collect data to refine
practice expense allocations. Since CMS has not completed this process,
it is proposing a two year moratorium on these modifications to allow
sufficient time to complete the practice survey process.
3. Unit Prices for Supplies
CMS has completed its survey of clinical practice expenses for
supplies and in Addendum D to the proposal, has established revised unit
prices for supplies.
4. Malpractice Expense Volatility
CMS has not proposed a GPC1 (geographic practice cost index) for
malpractice costs at this point. It proposes to collect 2001 and 2002
actual data, project 2003 malpractice costs, and make the GPCI proposal
by January 1, 2004. The contact for practice expense issues is Rick
Ensor (410-786-5617) and for the unit pricing of practice supplies is
Gail Addis (410-786-4552).
B. New Procedure Codes
1. Lesion Excision
CMS is proposing to make the work RVUs for
excision equal based upon excise diameters regardless of malignancy.
2. Monitoring Heart Rhythms
Since home cardiac monitoring has become available, CMS would like to
establish new codes and national payment amounts for these services, and
would classify them as diagnostic tests.
3. ESRD Visits
CMS has concluded that dialysis capitation is a disincentive for
patients to be seen by their physician and that some patients benefit
from more frequent visits.
Therefore, CMS is proposing to invalidate CPT codes 90918, 90919,
90920 and 90921 and create three new codes to cover different levels of
patient visits. The contacts for all coding issues are Diane Milstead
(410-786-3355), Latesha Walker (410-786-1101) or Gaysha Brooks
(410-786-3355).
Michael Cassidy is Chair of the firm’s Healthcare Practice Group. If
you have any questions about this article or the proposed fee schedule,
please contact Mike at 412.594.5515 or via e-mail at
mcassidy@tuckerlaw.com.
^ Back to top
CMS Publishes Two Final Rules Requiring More
Electronic Submissions
For two consecutive weeks, the Federal Register contained new rules
regarding electronic submission standards. The first was for the
submission of Medicare claims by physicians and providers, and the
second for the submission of Medicare cost reports. This article
contains a brief synopsis of the rules and how the covered health care
facilities may be affected.
Physician and Providers
All physicians and providers, excluding those covered by the
exceptions (which are primarily "small providers" as discussed below)
will be required to submit Medicare claims electronically after October
16, 2003.
The electronic submission requirement is a product of HIPAA and the
Administrative Simplification Act (ASA). Medicare is a covered entity
pursuant to HIPAA and, as such, is required to adhere to the HIPAA
electronic standards requirements. To assist Medicare in enforcing
compliance, the ASA requires Medicare to deny payment for claims which
are not submitted in accordance with the electronic standards, unless
exceptions are provided by regulation.
On August 15, 2003, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
issued interim final regulations implementing the ASA effective October
16, 2003. The electronic submission requirement will apply to providers
(defined by Medicare as hospitals, home health agencies, CORFs, SNFs and
rehabilitation facilities) and to all physicians (defined by Medicare as
doctors, dentists, podiatrists, optometrists and chiropractors),
practitioners, facilities or suppliers except the following:
1. Small providers, i.e. providers with fewer then 25 full time
employees;
2. Small practices, i.e. physician, practitioners, facilities or
suppliers with fewer than 10 full time employees;
3. Dental claims;
4. Electronic services interruptions outside of the control of the
billing entity; or
5. Other extraordinary circumstances approved by the Secretary of HHS.
The small practice exception could actually be the "rule," because
CMS and the AMA estimate that it will apply to 70 percent of physician
practices. CMS is reported to be concerned that so many practices will
convert to paper claims that the entire system will be "clogged."
Cost Reports for Health Care
Facilities
In the August 22, 2003 printing of the Federal Register, the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") published a final rule amending
a regulation that requires certain health care facilities to submit cost
reports required by Medicare in a standardized electronic format. This
rule goes into effect for cost reporting periods ending on or after Dec.
31, 2004, and affects all hospices, organ procurement organizations,
rural health clinics, federally qualified health centers, community
mental health centers, and end-state renal disease facilities.
Generally, the above facilities that participate in Medicare are
reimbursed for the reasonable costs of the covered items and services
provided to Medicare beneficiaries. In order to receive these
reimbursements, the facilities are required to maintain sufficient
financial records and statistical data to properly determine the amount
to be received by the facility. Providers are to submit cost reports
annually, following accounting, statistical and reporting practices as
accepted in the health care industry. The new rule handed down by CMS
states that these reports must follow the electronic filing requirements
already used by hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and home health
agencies.
The rule will be phased in over a two-year period, allowing the
affected entities an opportunity to familiarize themselves with the new
electronic filing requirements. To address the concern that some
facilities may not be able to afford the software necessary to implement
these new elec-tronic cost reports, CMS has stated that free software is
expected to be available by September 30, 2004 for those facilities that
are financially unable to purchase the software on their own.
The new rule applies to all cost reports ending on or after December
31, 2004, but a delay or waiver may be available where financial
hardships render compliance with the rule unreasonable for a facility.
The decision of whether or not to grant such delay or waiver will be
made by CMS on a case-by-case basis, based on factors such as cash-flow
problems, previous years’ operating losses and various other similar
fiscal problems. CMS is providing this two-year period as an opportunity
to rectify any problems that the affected facilities may experience.
"The change will make it easier to file and review cost reports,
helping Medicare to pay for services more accurately," said Tommy G.
Thompson, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary. CMS
believes that this move will free up important resources and time that
can be better used helping Medicare recipients.
^ Back to top
No
Malpractice Crisis ??
Physicians and professional organizations have frequently stated that
the malpractice problems in Pennsylvania are adversely impacting patient
access. Critics label this a hyperbole. The following facts, released by
the Pennsylvania Medical Society and reported recently by AMA News, make
the point regarding the decline in physicians for the period ending
December 31, 2002.
General Surgeons --
36% decrease in 6 years
Orthopedic Surgeons --
16% decrease
in 5 years
Neurosurgeons
-- 16% decrease in 7 years
Anesthesiologists --
6% decrease in 2 years
Obstetricians --
3% decrease in 2 years
< Back

|