News and Notes
  Meeting the Challenge of Health Law

What's Inside
 

IRS Release Annual Changes in Retirement Plan Limits for Calendar Year 2005

 

 

 

Non-Profit Hospital's Participation in LLC Imaging Venture does not Jeopardize Tax-Exempt Status

 

 
 

New York State Court Limits Defendant Hospital's Access to Treating Physicians

 

 
 

IRS Exempts Itself From HIPAA

 

 

Rush Limbaugh's Medical Records Properly Seized

   
   
   
 
 
 
   

 

 

 


 

Healthcare Law Briefs

October 29, 2004

 

*READ PAST ISSUES OF THE HEALTHCARE LAW BRIEFS

 

 

IRS NEWS



1. IRS Release Annual Changes in Retirement Plan Limits for Calendar Year 2005

  • 401(k) limit increased from $13,000 to $14,000.

  • Defined contribution plan contribution limit increased from $41,000 to $42,000.

  • Annual compensation limit increased from $205,000 to $210,000.

  • Key employee limitations in top-heavy plans increased from $130,000 to $130,500.

  • Definition of highly compensated employed increased from $90,000 to $95,000 and the definition of a key employee in a top-heavy plan was increased from $130,000 to $135,000.

 

<Top



2. Non-Profit Hospital's Participation in LLC Imaging Venture does not Jeopardize Tax-Exempt Status

In Private Letter Ruling No. 200436022, the IRS ruled that a hospital-physician joint venture does not jeopardize its tax-exempt status. The hospital plans to lease property to the LLC that will operate the imaging center, which would be managed by an independent management company, which would also be an investor in the Venture. The Letter Ruling also stated that the rental income would not constitute Unrelated Business Taxable Income (UBTI).

 

<Top



HIPAA NEWS



3. New York State Court Limits Defendant Hospital's Access to Treating Physicians

In Keschecki v. St. Vincent's Medical Center, a New York trial court prohibited the hospital from using the results of an unauthorized interview of the plaintiff's physician. Hospital's defense counsel interviewed the treating physicians after the incident, i.e. a complicated delivery. The court ruled that the patient's "HIPAA Authorization" did not cover access to their post-incident medical information, so its use was not authorized.

In these situations, it would appear that hospitals and physicians should either (a) have a more comprehensive release or (b) get a court order. There would also appear to be an argument that "operations", which includes "conducting or arranging for medical review, legal services . . ." might cover this issue.

 

<Top



4. IRS Exempts Itself From HIPAA

The Chief Counsel office of the IRS recently issued a notice stating that, once the IRS has obtained PHI through one of the 3 valid law enforcement exceptions, HIPAA does not thereafter govern the subsequent use of the information so obtained, because the IRS is not a covered entity. There was probably never any question about this position. However, it does illustrate that HIPAA covers only covered entities, as defined in the law, and not simply an entity that possesses PHI.

 

<Top



5. Rush Limbaugh's Medical Records Properly Seized

A Florida appellate court has ruled that state criminal investigators properly seized Rush Limbaugh's medical records from a private physician's office as part of a criminal investigation. Limbaugh's objections were not based on HIPAA, but upon Florida constitutional privacy rights.

 

 

<Top

 

 

>For more information about the topics presented in this newsletter please contact one of the Healthcare Attorneys:

Read the September issue of our HEALTHCARE NEWSLETTER.

 

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

1500 One PPG Place  Pittsburgh, PA 15222   412/566-1212

<Back

 

 

 

*SIGN UP for the

e- mail newsletter

 

CONTACT US

 














A Century of Service | | Visitor Area | Contact Webmaster


This site has been optimized for:

Get Flash


Copyright © 2000 Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Site development provided by H2.