|
What's Inside
 |

|
| |
Pennsylvania Blue Shield Revises Audit
Process |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare Law Briefs
October 11, 2004
PENNSYLVANIA BLUE SHIELD REVISES AUDIT
PROCESS
In the
August 2004 PRN, Highmark announced the revision of its audit
process. The heading in the release refers to this as the "consultant
review process", but this is the process by which Highmark audits your
claims.
Heretofore,
the process has been a three step process in which:
-
Highmark
would retain an independent consultant to review your records and
produce a report;
-
You would
receive the report and would have the opportunity to submit additional
information and request a review by a second consultant; and
-
You could
then appeal any decision to the Medical Review Committee.
Highmark
has eliminated the second step, and has justified this by stating that
"this will allow for more timely conclusion to the review process".
This may be
true, but I do not think time is the issue. The "second consultant
step" was an important protection for providers. It allowed an
"independent" consultant, although one regularly retained by Highmark,
to review the issues considering both perspectives, i.e. Highmark's
perspective and yours after you had the opportunity to review the files,
provide additional information, and even provide an independent
consultant opinion of your own. In cases in which the billing was
appropriate, it has been my experience that this regularly allowed
providers to resolve the matter without the need for a medical review
committee hearing. Now, not only will the hearing be your only
recourse, but the hearing will be performed by Highmark's selected
medical review committee.
Furthermore, Although, the operation of this remains to be seen in the
future, I do not yet know how this will impact your use of outside
consultants. Will you be permitted to provide the outside consultant's
opinion in writing or will your consultant be required to appear and
testify? This submission of written affidavit/opinions is not
permitted, this will make it much more difficult for you to present the
opinions of outside experts.
If you have
any questions on this topic, please contact Mike Cassidy at
mcassidy@tuckerlaw.com.
<Top
>For more information about the
topics presented in this newsletter please contact one of the
Healthcare
Attorneys:
Read
the September issue of our
HEALTHCARE NEWSLETTER.
 Tucker Arensberg,
P.C.
1500 One PPG
Place Pittsburgh, PA 15222 412/566-1212
<Back |
|

*SIGN
UP for the
e- mail newsletter
CONTACT US

|