News and Notes
  Meeting the Challenge of Health Law

What's Inside
 

Credentialing News: 

Exclusive Credentialing Developments

 

 
     
     
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
   

 

 

 


 

Healthcare Law Briefs

March 19, 2004

 

*READ PAST ISSUES OF THE HEALTHCARE LAW BRIEFS

 

Credentialing News: 

Exclusive Credentialing Developments

 

 

1. Idaho:  Four physicians whose privileges were terminated pursuant to a loyalty-based medical staffing plan have sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin HCA, Inc. from terminating their privileges at Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center in Idaho Falls, Idaho.  (Biddulph v. HCA, Inc., Idaho Dist. Ct., No. CV-04-1219)

 

2. Ohio:  Seventeen physicians who sought a temporary restraining order prohibiting termination of their privileges predicated upon investment in a competing specialty hospital (i.e. New Albany Surgical Hospital in Columbus, Ohio) voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit.  (Berasi v. Ohio Health Corp., Ohio Ct. C.P., No. 04CVA-2406).  The Hospital claims this vindicates its right to adopt conflict-of-interest protective policies.

 

3. Kentucky Court Defines "Investigation" for HCQIA Reporting:  A cardiologist who resigned his clinical privileges sought a declaratory judgment in a Kentucky court for the purpose of establishing that he had not resigned while under investigation for HCQIA Data Bank reporting purposes.  Although there is no statutory definition of being "under investigation" the Court found that the guidance issued by the Data Bank justified the hospital's reporting of the resignation because the hospital's action was a hospital service focused upon the physician for issues of professional competence.  (Omar v. Jewish Hospital Healthcare Services, Inc., Ky. Ct. App. No. 2003-CA-000255-MR).

 

4. Federal Court Declines to View Exclusive Credentialing Policy as a Federal Anti-Kickback Issue A deferral district court dismissed a claim in federal court seeking to enjoin the enforcement of medical staff policy limiting medical staff membership in conflict-of-interest situations.  The court declined to exercise federal jurisdiction on the basis that no federal issue was presented.  Murphy v. Baptist Health, E.D. Ark. No. 4-04-112.

 

<Top

 

 

 

>For more information about the topics presented in this newsletter please contact one of the Healthcare Attorneys:

Read the December 2003 issue of our HEALTHCARE NEWSLETTER.

 

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

1500 One PPG Place  Pittsburgh, PA 15222   412/566-1212

<Back

 

 

 

*SIGN UP for the

e- mail newsletter

 

CONTACT US

 














A Century of Service | | Visitor Area | Contact Webmaster


This site has been optimized for:

Get Flash


Copyright © 2000 Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Site development provided by H2.