
|


Tucker Arensberg's Technology practice group is comprised of
attorneys from each of the firm's practice areas so as to provide
services from as many legal disciplines as possible.
Typical Technology Company Representations:
- The firm routinely advises clients on financing matters,
including introductions to and negotiating with angel investors,
venture capital firms and conventional debt-equity financing.
- The firm routinely counsels technology clients on the
following business issues:
-corporate formation /structure issues
- employment contracts and creative compensations structures
- non-competes and other restrictive employment covenants
- trade secret matters
- The firm has handled numerous patent, trademark and copyright
restrictions for software, architectural and literary works and
counsels clients on infringement issues. Additionally, the firm
has litigated many disputes involving all of these matters.
- The firm has prosecuted scores of actions on behalf of
employers to enforce restrictive covenants based upon four
departing employees' access to trade secrets.
- Our attorneys have advised many clients on patentability of
products, devices and processes including business and software
algorithm methods for financial institutional clients.
- The firm brought an action on behalf of a software consulting
and e-commerce firm against a former employee who, the day he
announced his resignation to join a competitor, sent an e-mail to
his personal account which included highly confidential
information downloaded from the employer's database.
- One of the firm's attorneys defended, in a federal criminal
case, the first defendant prosecuted in the Western District of
Pennsylvania under the federal Economic Espionage Act. Following a
preliminary hearing but prior to the actual trial, the attorney
obtained a favorable plea agreement.
- Representing a franchisor, the firm successfully obtained an
injunction against former franchisee based upon claims of unfair
competition and trademark infringement. The injunction prevented
the franchisee form using the markings, logo and name of the
franchisor.
- The firm defended a manufacturing concern which had been
accused of using technical information which had been wrongfully
obtained from the plaintiff.
- The firm represented an employer seeking to enforce a
restrictive employment covenant which was based upon the former
employee's access to trade secrets.
- The firm defended a large pharmaceutical manufacturer in a
patent infringement action. A favorable settlement resulted.
- The firm has been approved as panel counsel by a large
insurance company in reference to a new e-commerce/Internet
coverage it has began to offer.
- The firm has handled numerous disputes arising from the use of
Internet domain names.
< Back

|

|

|

|